insights

Are Super Bowl Commercials Worth It? How to Judge Any Ad Buy

Are Super Bowl commercials worth it? For a few of the biggest brands on earth, yes. For almost everyone else asking the question, no. But the price tag is not what decides it, and that is where most of this debate goes wrong. A Super Bowl ad is worth the money when the attention you are buying matches the attention you actually need, and a waste of it when it doesn’t. The number on the check is a distraction from the only question that matters.

Let’s define the thing first, because the argument hides inside the definition. A Super Bowl commercial is the most expensive thirty seconds in advertising: a single national spot during the most-watched broadcast of the American year. Advertisers paid close to $8 million for a 30-second spot during Super Bowl LIX, and that figure only buys the airtime. Production and talent are on top of it. So when people ask whether it is worth it, they are usually staring at that eight-million-dollar number and asking whether anything could possibly justify it.

Wrong frame. The question is not whether the price is big. It is whether the attention is the right kind, in the right quantity, pointed at the right people. Read the section that matches what you are actually trying to figure out, or read straight through.

What are you really paying for with a Super Bowl ad?

You are paying for attention that is awake.

Here is the part that makes the Super Bowl genuinely different from every other ad buy. On almost every other screen, people treat advertising as the price of admission, the thing to scroll past or tune out while they wait for what they came for. The Super Bowl flips that. It is the one broadcast of the year where a large share of the audience leans in to watch the commercials on purpose. Per an Ipsos study, 78% of Super Bowl viewers say they deliberately watch the ads, 24% say they watch all of them attentively, and 11% say the commercials are their primary reason for tuning in at all.

That is the asset. Not the reach. The reach you can buy almost anywhere; the attention you cannot. And the reach is real too: Super Bowl LIX drew a record 127.7 million average viewers, the largest audience for any telecast in American television history. So the buy is a rare combination, a massive crowd that is actually paying attention, at the single moment of the year when people want to see the ads. When marketers say the Super Bowl is unique, this is what they mean, and it is true.

The mistake is assuming that because the attention is real, it is worth it for you.

Is a Super Bowl commercial worth it for my business?

Almost certainly not, and the reason has nothing to do with whether you can afford it.

Run the test that decides every ad buy, not just this one. Before you spend a dollar on any medium, three questions settle it:

  • How attentive will the audience be in the medium you are buying? The Super Bowl scores higher here than any buy in advertising. Most of your other options score far lower.
  • How aware is that audience of your brand already? A hundred and twenty-seven million strangers who have never heard of you is a very different buy than a hundred and twenty-seven million people primed to recognize you.
  • Is your message relevant to the people you are reaching, right now? Mass attention pointed at people who will never buy what you sell is expensive noise.

Now apply it. The Super Bowl passes the first question and fails the third for almost everyone. A regional service business, a B2B company with four hundred real prospects, a brand whose buyer is a specific person in a specific place, all of them would be paying eight million dollars to put their message in front of a hundred and twenty-seven million people, the overwhelming majority of whom are not, and will never be, their customer. The attention is genuine. The match is not. You would be buying the most awake audience in advertising and wasting almost all of it.

The brands the buy works for are the ones whose actual customer is “nearly everyone,” with the budget to convert that broad awareness into sales over the following year. Soda. Beer. Cars. Phones. Streaming services. For them the relevance question passes, because their answer to “who is your customer” really is most of the room. For the rest of us, the honest answer is that there are cheaper places to reach the exact people who will buy, and reaching the wrong people is not a bargain at any price.

Attention you cannot use is not an asset. It is a bill.

Tyler Kelley

Is television advertising still worth it at all?

Yes, when you buy it for what it is and not for what it used to be.

The dated version of this argument treats TV as either the king of all media or a dying relic, and both are wrong. Television, the Super Bowl included, is one medium with a particular profile: broad, relatively expensive per person reached, strong for building awareness, weak for the kind of tight targeting that digital does cheaply. None of that makes it dead. It makes it a tool with a job. The job is reaching a wide audience to build recognition, and it is still good at that job. The error is hiring it for a job it was never built to do, like generating direct response from a narrow, specific buyer you could reach for a fraction of the cost online.

Where the conversation has genuinely moved is fragmentation. Attention is split across more screens, more platforms, and more formats than any single buy can cover, which means the question is no longer “TV or not” but “which mix of mediums actually reaches the person who buys from me, and in what proportion.” That is a media planning question, and it is the one worth your time. The Super Bowl debate is a flashy distraction from it.

So how do you actually decide?

Start from the customer, never from the medium.

The reason the Super Bowl question is so easy to get wrong is that it starts at the wrong end. It starts with a famous, expensive medium and asks whether to buy it. Reverse the order. Begin with the person you are trying to reach, get specific about who they are and where their attention actually lives, and the right mediums select themselves. A medium is only ever worth it relative to a buyer. There is no such thing as a good ad buy in the abstract.

This is why the work that comes before the buy decides the buy. Know exactly who you are selling to, down to the buyer persona, and you stop asking whether a famous medium is worth it and start asking where your specific person is actually paying attention. Understand why people buy in the first place, and you stop confusing a big crowd with a ready one. The discipline is the same whether the buy is eight million dollars or eighty: match the attention you pay for to the attention you need, and refuse to pay for the rest.

So, are Super Bowl commercials worth it? For Coca-Cola, yes. For you, run the three questions honestly and let the answer be the answer. The price was never the point. The fit always was.

To go deeper on reaching the right person instead of the biggest crowd, read how to build a buyer persona. And to plan a mix of mediums that actually fits your buyer, read our take on media planning and buying.

Sources

  1. Nielsen, Super Bowl LIX Makes TV History With Over 127 Million Viewers (2025)
  2. CBS News, How much do 2025 Super Bowl commercials cost? (2025)
  3. Ipsos, The Super Bowl's Best Ads of 2025 (FastFacts study, December 2024)
Talk with us about your marketing

In good company. A few of the organizations we have worked alongside.